tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post971037772890859569..comments2024-03-16T12:05:48.572+08:00Comments on 西環的黃金歲月: 悼念英國左派大宗師oceandeep3000http://www.blogger.com/profile/15295585199137008654noreply@blogger.comBlogger30125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-85081350258558573842014-08-09T02:53:26.974+08:002014-08-09T02:53:26.974+08:00I can only conclude this with Judy Garland's f...I can only conclude this with Judy Garland's famous saying in " Wizard of the Oz" ; there's no place like home~~oceandeep3000https://www.blogger.com/profile/15295585199137008654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-8799487020508739262014-07-24T17:30:32.210+08:002014-07-24T17:30:32.210+08:00Today, while I was at work, my sisdter stole my ip...Today, while I was at work, my sisdter stole my iphone and tedted to see iff it can survive a forty foot drop, just so she can be a youtube sensation. My iPad is now <br />destroyed annd shee has 83 views. I know thks is entireely off topic but I had to share it with someone!<br /><br /><br />my site; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Commons_of_the_United_Kingdom" rel="nofollow">England and Scotland Info at Wikipedia</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-49565511114526678212014-05-09T02:23:31.150+08:002014-05-09T02:23:31.150+08:00隨著年齡日長, 社會近二三十年人情世故就跟科技一樣,瞬息萬變,當然有好,可是更壞的比比皆是,如,環境...隨著年齡日長, 社會近二三十年人情世故就跟科技一樣,瞬息萬變,當然有好,可是更壞的比比皆是,如,環境,食物,食水安全!<br />六七十年代西方也好,東方也好,在戰後重建後期,一班"知識份子"在衣食稍足時, 有時間思索社會問題,而且當時舊社會秩序,生產,金融,商業系統亦不斷發現有不足及偏頗,二戰前夕,舊勢力各種迂腐至令納粹及軍國主義逞強逞兇,所以當時的年青人對權威蔑視,對經驗忽視,跟著就"自以為是",以為熱情跟幻想可以帶領一切,於是破舊熾熱,但是現實是,千年的經驗有些是血與汗跟泪取得,良莠自有不齊,但良者亦不少,無選擇的破,不論西方東方,其破壞力影響至今,可惜少數人能夠客觀面對現實,社會秩序與及人際交往,君子道德等等已難重組,弟在楓葉親身體會西方那一套,其實千瘡百孔,(很多人移民,極少留意當地社會,都是自我滿足於衣食住行,享受"社會主義"式的服務,世事于我何干,故此回鄉只吹噓"美好"的一面),弟之不停提出,替家鄉擔心,就是如此,盲目迷信任何一切,都會有極大風險跟危險!楓葉社會問題多得不得了,大秦裡面的各種不堪,其實楓葉一樣存在,不過她太幸運了,上帝眷顧,上天下地入水都是寶,資源之豐盛,難以想像,又因人口少,很多問題都放少了,又因天氣影響,一般土生土長都性格散漫,不太計較,所以表面來說,平和淡靜!<br />嘮叨一大片,主要是西環兄這幾段講述英倫人與事及社會,音樂人的事,其中他們的言與行,出發點是要社會公平點,一些舊情要破,有點兒現在家鄉所發生的,不過過往及現在的"痛苦經驗",家鄉父老有沒有高人能醍醐灌頂一下,老祖宗的"中庸"哲學,有時真是好的工具!<br />少時也偏激過,極端過,反叛過,跟神父課室互毆,跟老師不顧一切反對他的講課,年青時更甚,夜校臨會考時,在課堂要打校長,(所以失去讀師範機會~~奇怪,那時想當老師),可是隨著時間,隨著現實,更因最後以"孖屐亭"為生,反而"右"向了,其實真的,如今很多學者,政客,社會活動家,憤青就是缺少"孖屐亭"的鍛鍊及經驗,只懂"擇善固執",其實他們的"善"是否隱藏"核彈"?好心未必能成就好事!退一步海濶天空,說易難行!四零後https://www.blogger.com/profile/07721892232323290832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-3676627057606991432014-05-08T21:25:47.087+08:002014-05-08T21:25:47.087+08:00唉!中年心事濃如酒~~唉!中年心事濃如酒~~oceandeep3000https://www.blogger.com/profile/15295585199137008654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-51740966934294636992014-05-08T09:17:05.667+08:002014-05-08T09:17:05.667+08:00香江是我的家鄉,也是根,看見如此,痛且怕兼傷,咁講法,咁你又去移民?
想當年,點解走去人地果度,一是...香江是我的家鄉,也是根,看見如此,痛且怕兼傷,咁講法,咁你又去移民?<br />想當年,點解走去人地果度,一是所操行業,面臨淘汰,轉行不易,對本身立足生活擔心,二是受到客戶及朋友影響,希望生活空間多一啲,三是希望兩個孩子天空海闊一啲,四是立這山,望那山,總是那山風景特好!五是對當時某些人與物非常厭惡(唔係阿爺,阿爺其實邊得閒理你,自身難保)!但係結果係,,,,,,到處楊梅開一樣的花,到處烏鴉都係黑色嘅!年青人搵食同前途都"非常艱難,所以大仔跑回香港,細仔也曾回流(可惜頂不起租金,被迫返加),本身無一技之長,白白浪費了"黃金"二十多年,多年都找機會回流(一起移民的數家人全部回流,只餘下細佬)可惜蝸牛問題,無辦法解决!成日話家鄉人身在福中不知福,好多嘢係"非常"突出,但係從前幾年起,睇見家鄉有部份人與事,,,,,,係,,,,,,細佬真係好唔安樂也!!!四零後https://www.blogger.com/profile/07721892232323290832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-39369328161059128902014-05-08T09:00:05.461+08:002014-05-08T09:00:05.461+08:00西環兄所講的人與事影響至今,弟在楓葉卑詩省,這些影響隨處可見,其好與不好已經不是簡單的二元了,不過一...西環兄所講的人與事影響至今,弟在楓葉卑詩省,這些影響隨處可見,其好與不好已經不是簡單的二元了,不過一事是有一點諷刺的,就是打破傳統的,如今變了"古典"!<br />喜歡西環兄的文字!也喜歡西環兄的心事!四零後https://www.blogger.com/profile/07721892232323290832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-38828165437806914682014-05-08T08:46:49.527+08:002014-05-08T08:46:49.527+08:00又係想當年,當年的報紙,副刊作者都是精英,抗日戰爭及內戰逃亡或移民來港以執筆找生活,對於文史哲,不理...又係想當年,當年的報紙,副刊作者都是精英,抗日戰爭及內戰逃亡或移民來港以執筆找生活,對於文史哲,不理會紅色報的正字立塲跟一些報導跟論說,紅色報真係有不可多得的介紹,新晚及正午的葉靈鳯,曹聚仁等等,小弟得益匪淺,梁羽生武俠小說里的詞的介紹,使小弟及弟的兒時玩伴迷上了納蘭性德及他的詞,新生晚的十三妹,四方談,明報月刊的丁望,胡菊人,,,,,一切一切,有人說香港是文化沙漠,但是在六十年代,七十年代郤是百花齊放,反之現時,,,真的是文化沙漠了,前年起已經停止購買報紙了,明報從他創刊看了數十年,最後放棄了!很奇怪,現時"學者"或"傳媒"或"知識份子"受教育比以前多,往國外留學多,旅遊更多,可是無法跟六七年代那一輩(可能都全蹲在象牙塔內,不屑下凡),在很多地方閱讀到他們的文字,或在媒體看見聽見他們的發言,小弟可能程度不夠,或"代溝",二字曰"無趣"!還有對回歸後香港教育當局的所作所為,完全不明所以,取消必修中國歷史一事,小弟耿耿於懷!香江有一怪異問題,是一般人或大部份人對"執正體"跟國家民族分不清楚,瞭解自已"國家"(不是正權)跟自身民族是非常必要,可惜今時今日,"厭烏及屋",反對或厭惡當前執正者,連自己的根也無明的反及厭,可歎,,,,西環兄跟小弟在七十年代都曾體驗,民族自尊的可貴!到今時今日,世界還跟大同有夢<br />想般距離,自身認同還是有必要!又是那一句,很高興也很祈望西環兄有時間有心情多介紹如此貼的東西!四零後https://www.blogger.com/profile/07721892232323290832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-60832179093913781042014-05-08T02:41:00.243+08:002014-05-08T02:41:00.243+08:00Recently the pass away of 羅孚 did struck my mind. ...Recently the pass away of 羅孚 did struck my mind. He was not only an cultural icon and renowned journalists, more noticeable, he represented the awakening few who were immersed in the Communist Party’s doctrines and then awoke to live and work according to his own conscience. 羅孚 was the chief editor of 新晚報. In its hey days the 新晚報’s Supplement was like a bountiful feast, with eminent writers such as 蕭銅 to talk about the people and anecdote of the early republican days , and I believe 新晚報 was also the first newspaper that introduced 松本清張 to HK readers. As 新晚報 was an evening newspaper, readers can enjoy it after work with a relax mood. It was such a splendid and enchanting time, with no iphone and people used to live slowly, and treat everything earnestly. However, all these were overthrown during the Cultural Revolution when all leftist newspapers can only hold one single tone to serve political purposes. After Cultural Revolution subsided and Deng came into power, things seem set sail to the blue sea, however, a greater crisis awaited for him and he was sentenced to 10 years of jail for espionage charges. I always wonder, if during the Cultural Revolution he broke away with the leftist camp and set up a newspaper of his own, not only his fate will be totally different for the rest of his life, his achievement as a journalist will be comparable to, if not surpass Louis Cha (查良镛), who set up Ming Pao. As an highbrow who love art, literature, history, philosophy , freedom is the crown jewel, by freedom I don’t just mean the freedom of the body, but also the freedom of one’s mind and the right to express ones will. 羅孚 was so very unfortunate that he was deprived of this right for a long time, but he was a stubborn man who stood firmly by his belief. He might lack the luck and insight of Louis Cha who enjoyed the privilege of expressing his views via Ming Pao, a newspaper that advocates English culture and spirit of humanities. Nevertheless, although he was lost for a considerable period of time, eventually he came to realize the truth, and was eternally set free. He won my ultimate respect and I hope he can now rest in real peace~~oceandeep3000https://www.blogger.com/profile/15295585199137008654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-59969220391413510202014-05-08T02:08:52.241+08:002014-05-08T02:08:52.241+08:00I am really flattered, who am I to dare to compare...I am really flattered, who am I to dare to compare to your mentor? The issue of 港英餘孽 is really two sides of a coin, on one hand it seem to be outdated ( and impractical) to stay clinging to the sentiments of British rules, however, seems like the colonial days ( sorry that I cant find a better phrase to describe the ex 97 HK) serves as a mirror that reflect everything we are experiencing today are cognitionally incompatible~~oceandeep3000https://www.blogger.com/profile/15295585199137008654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-83211855500850818442014-05-08T01:47:08.056+08:002014-05-08T01:47:08.056+08:00My comment was too long that I have to break it do...My comment was too long that I have to break it down into 2 parts, here are the second half:<br /><br />Music was always the medium through which all these cultural upheavals were filtered. The Who’s My Generation was a two-fingered salute to anyone who dared question the new tyranny of youth, while the group’s climactic destruction of their equipment was a direct homage to the “auto-destructive” art of Gustav Metzger.<br /><br /><br />The Theatre of the Absurd and the Theatre of Cruelty sought to break down the “hierarchical” barriers between performers and audience; to challenge bourgeois assumptions about such vital (for the time) questions as Britain’s support for America in the Vietnam War, and to test the limits of censorship – and, all too frequently, the audience’s patience.<br /><br /><br />What all these disparate events signalled was a challenge to “the System”, as the jargon of the day had it, that would become as political as it was cultural.<br /><br /><br />Jim Haynes is largely forgotten now, but he was an important architect of what became known as “the underground”. An expatriate American, in 1959 Haynes opened The Paperback in Edinburgh, the first bookshop in Britain to stock the writings of the American “Beat” authors and Henry Miller at a time when his books were banned under the obscenity laws.<br /><br /><br />Moving to London, he was one of the founders in 1966 of IT, Britain’s first underground newspaper, and in the same year he established the Arts Lab in Drury Lane – London’s first space for the artistic “happenings” which so characterised the period. Its ideology, Haynes said, “was to never say the word ‘no’. And out of it, God knows what would happen, but whatever it was would be fun.” He might have been talking about the underground as a whole.<br /><br /><br />Once again, the Beatles were in the vanguard. At the time of Sgt Pepper, even the Queen reportedly remarked that “the Beatles are getting a little strange these days”. Of course, it was to be short-lived. The underground fractured into political radicalism, drug-bound apathy and naked commercial ambition. True to Hamilton’s dictum, Pop’s counter-culture had become big business, revolt had become style. On September 1968, the “love rock” musical Hair opened in London – a day after the abolition of the Lord Chamberlain’s role as theatre censor. Hair was the first theatrical production to portray full-frontal nudity on a West End stage, the first rock musical, and certainly the first to include songs celebrating hashish, LSD and, as one song title succinctly put it, Sodomy. Outside the theatre, hippies – real ones – protested at the “exploitation” of the counter-culture. <br /><br /><br />Four months later, the Beatles gave their last public performance on the rooftop of Apple’s headquarters in Savile Row, London. Swinging London, and the revolution, was officially dead, and the Sixties with it. Hard political and economic reality was just around the corner. But nothing would ever be the same again~~<br />oceandeep3000https://www.blogger.com/profile/15295585199137008654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-14924523963023836102014-05-08T01:46:27.387+08:002014-05-08T01:46:27.387+08:00Its funny that you should talk about the British c...Its funny that you should talk about the British culture in the olden days, I particularly admire England in the 1960s, which can be described as the colour-popping 60s. I sure hope you wont mind me using this comment column to talk about my reminisce of this by gone era, so lets talk about England at her best.<br /><br /><br />Who kick-started the Sixties? Well, the artist Richard Hamilton might be one candidate, coining the term Pop Art and writing its first manifesto. He described pop art as “Popular; Transient; Expendable; Low Cost; Mass Produced; Young; Witty; Sexy; Gimmicky; Glamorous; and Big Business”. Hamilton was actually writing this in 1957, but eras have an awkward tendency to resist being tied to convenient dates. As a prescription for the revolution to come, his manifesto was pretty unbeatable.<br /><br /><br />The cultural explosion of the Sixties was a product of affluence and mass consumerism, a brief hysterical interlude in which youth reigned supreme, sex came out from under the covers, elitism and deference were held hostage and, for a fleeting moment, the whiff of cordite hung in the air.<br /><br /><br />Of course, the Beatles also had something to do with it.<br />I was 6, or 7 when the first Beatles single, Love Me Do, was released – a little young to realise that a revolution was in the offing, but not too young to be captured by the sheer exuberance of their music. It seems now that the Beatles mark a point in British history when the world turned from black and white into colour, and then into Day-Glo, that tilting point from post-war austerity to “you’ve never had it so good” affluence. Their provincialism, their jokey, unapologetically working-class manner, allied to musical genius, changed the face of what was socially and culturally acceptable at a stroke.<br /><br /><br />They were an explicit act of revolt against the barriers of age, class and the division between popular and high culture – a force that nobody could afford to ignore. “Serious” music critics deliberated on whether Lennon and McCartney were composers the equal of Mahler and Brahms; Harold Wilson pandered to popular taste by dolling out MBEs to the group. By 1966, the pop revolution, of which the Beatles were in the vanguard, had made London the cultural capital of the world – or at least the pop-cultural capital of the world, which for a while was the only culture that mattered. London was officially “The Swinging City” as Time magazine famously pronounced, the global hub of youthful creativity, hedonism and excitement. “In a decade dominated by youth, London has burst into bloom. It swings; it is the scene.” Well, yes, and no. Few Londoners, let alone Britons, were dancing at the Ad Lib or having their hair cut by Vidal Sassoon, “the man with the magic comb”, as Time had it. <br /><br /><br />Time was, anyway, a year or two too late. By 1966, the ripples of Swinging London were already a flood, sweeping through music, fashion and film, from Antonioni’s “Blow Up” – a painfully self-conscious study of Sixties hipness – to Clive Donner’s “Here We Go Round the Mulberry Bush” . A bittersweet confection about a teenager in the suburbs (filmed in the swinging purlieus of Stevenage) desperate to taste the fruits of the burgeoning sexual freedoms, Donner’s film perfectly captured the blithe innocence, and fabulous music, of the times – and actually made a deeper impression on me (call it identification) than Blow Up.<br /><br /><br />Richard Hamilton, meanwhile, would make his own ironic riposte to Swinging London, and the establishment’s revenge, with his painting Swingeing London, which showed Mick Jagger and the art-dealer Robert Fraser being driven away in handcuffs after the Jagger drugs trial of 1967~~<br />oceandeep3000https://www.blogger.com/profile/15295585199137008654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-30548891879177078072014-05-08T01:41:34.593+08:002014-05-08T01:41:34.593+08:00To this, I like to quote this short poem from 冰心&#... To this, I like to quote this short poem from 冰心's 寄小讀者 - " 消受白蓮花世界,風來四面臥中央" , to ease you, as well as On John 兄's anxiety~~oceandeep3000https://www.blogger.com/profile/15295585199137008654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-36727266959185301382014-05-07T23:26:13.834+08:002014-05-07T23:26:13.834+08:00無得擔心嘅,要來的始終要來,自己做好防風措施,保護好自己才是正道。無得擔心嘅,要來的始終要來,自己做好防風措施,保護好自己才是正道。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-64258372320616706472014-05-07T22:15:25.815+08:002014-05-07T22:15:25.815+08:00多謝,家陣真係好擔心家鄉!多謝,家陣真係好擔心家鄉!四零後https://www.blogger.com/profile/07721892232323290832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-71954340655240925622014-05-07T22:15:02.560+08:002014-05-07T22:15:02.560+08:00作者已經移除這則留言。四零後https://www.blogger.com/profile/07721892232323290832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-88050181079280304092014-05-07T18:07:01.921+08:002014-05-07T18:07:01.921+08:00説得好!(安兄有諒。恕狂妄,在下甚少讚人。)説得好!(安兄有諒。恕狂妄,在下甚少讚人。)johnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12930253748659448993noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-84914269451989745442014-05-07T15:24:56.215+08:002014-05-07T15:24:56.215+08:00又,想當年,大衛連等導演的電影,濃濃的英倫人文味道,真是令人迷醉,甚至笑片一梅,什麽禧春系列,大鼻佬...又,想當年,大衛連等導演的電影,濃濃的英倫人文味道,真是令人迷醉,甚至笑片一梅,什麽禧春系列,大鼻佬那種倫敦東區及鄉間土佬的“不堪”夾雜英國佬普羅小人物的幽默,如今何在?彼得澳圖的瘋狂,大衛尼雲的執著,也是想當年,如今在電視新聞所見到的各類人的表現?香江一百五十年釀造的威士忌,一經露風,轉眼已成醋!這都是家鄉父老叔伯兄弟姐妹自己雙手打破酒桶,不要遷過或推御責任於“強秦”,大秦自身難保,那有時間去偷那充滿莎士比亞鄉稻草埋藏的好酒,都是自作孽而已!四零後https://www.blogger.com/profile/07721892232323290832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-81718948469979659082014-05-07T15:03:42.171+08:002014-05-07T15:03:42.171+08:00西環大佬這篇懷念英國一位“擇善固執”的政客令小弟很感興趣而且有㸃興奮,還有濃濃的懷舊味兒,何解?原因...西環大佬這篇懷念英國一位“擇善固執”的政客令小弟很感興趣而且有㸃興奮,還有濃濃的懷舊味兒,何解?原因是自八十年代香港經濟起飛後,有份量的談文說藝,介紹哲人及學者,詩人,政治的雜誌及報纸,都受到社會重商及地產泛濫,還有教育制度改變急速消失,所以文史哲,人文,藝術的普及同大眾化普羅化失去了!想當年,文星,雜誌,中國學生周報,蕉風,文藝,今日世界,海洋文藝,七十年代,新生晚報,新晚,那時間的明報月刊,還有許多許多這類雜誌同友聯出版社等等,介紹很多西方及環宇文史哲社政經,讓小弟這些不通英語或英文不太好的人有機會接觸以上的東西,如今雖然如有興趣者可在網上隨便搜尋,但總覺有人帶領及介紹較好,英國文史哲社政經名家太多值得介紹,尤以二戰前後,有些好像離現今太遠,但其實好近,比如羅素,如今已無人提及,西環大佬想當時有不少這些東西,其實也算香江懷舊,因為這些也曾經影響過很多當時的“香港年青人”!四零後https://www.blogger.com/profile/07721892232323290832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-69602395847712170242014-05-07T13:16:17.153+08:002014-05-07T13:16:17.153+08:00Although this blog is dedicated to the good old ti...Although this blog is dedicated to the good old times of Hong Kong, however, I tried not to set a strict rule and ceiling here as to what topic should or should not be included here. After all, this is a personal blog with no particular agenda, I write whats on my mind at that particular moment when I pick up my pen ( or rather , the pen of the writing pad). As you can see from my 300 + blogs, the subjects cover a wide range of themes, nostalgic and reminiscent ones are of course the most prominent ones, however, I like to talk about people too, not only celebrities but also people I knew or I came across in some point of my life, whom have left a vestige in my mind. In retrospective, everyone carries a history, and if you enlarge this piece of history, it is a reflection of the era in which he or she live and reside. I reckon that I might want to write more about people in the future, may be bibliography of nobody but are hard evidence of the time past. People are trapped in history, and history is trapped in them., don’t they?oceandeep3000https://www.blogger.com/profile/15295585199137008654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-25630617678131486612014-05-07T13:00:27.988+08:002014-05-07T13:00:27.988+08:00I suppose this is the necessary evil for the so ca...I suppose this is the necessary evil for the so called civilized and law abiding society. We cant get the best of both world,ie to curb the power of the police force, and to expect them to uphold law and order efficiently, or vice versa, there is always a price to pay for everything, and we are living in such a give and take situation everyday. The attitude of Tao is not worth discussing here, he is just a small political figure who is accustomed to criticize any event to win sound bite. As our net friend Ricky Lam remarked, its a matter of third party sarcastic comments~~oceandeep3000https://www.blogger.com/profile/15295585199137008654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-60088858657913898112014-05-07T06:24:15.890+08:002014-05-07T06:24:15.890+08:00其實警員都是普通人,學堂受訓跟實際相距好遠,有些人一世平安,做到食糧都冇事發生過係身上,但係有些係好...其實警員都是普通人,學堂受訓跟實際相距好遠,有些人一世平安,做到食糧都冇事發生過係身上,但係有些係好惹事嘅,撞親都係難哽或危險,老差骨可能比新仔仲差如果新仔遇過多件案,咁佢就反應好過老差骨!<br />係現塲,唔係好似報紙佬同所謂議員或揸支咪係大氣電波吹水咁,一味"風涼",遇到呢件事,對方有利刀,而且情緒失控,個女子同女警已經跌到地上,呢千份一秒嘅决定,同埋自己會被刀斬到嘅危險,唔做過,唔知艱難,曾經有個一位"漏埗"差人遇到過有人呼救要去制止開片,真係"驚"到震㗎!果陣時仲未有小露寶,又得六發,,唔去唔得,果種驚係人嘅正常反應,,,請果啲得把口嘅人設身處地諗下喇!,,,,,,講返呢件嘢,當然要調查同睇番影帶,但係果位"議員"出身係律師,應知道英式法律係乜嘢,佢咁隨便亂嗡,公唔公平,對法律公唔公正!佢咁樣"抽水"即係佢嘅專業操守同道德好有問題,,,,<br />英國嘅法律制度同執業人,嘅操守,英國嘅政客,唔好講好似西環大佬介紹果位彭先生一般都唔會咁嘅表現,枉費佢係香港大學出身嘅!<br />西環大佬除咗介紹香港懷舊外,介紹下英國嘅人物同係英國經驗係會對網友有極大好處,西環大佬,,,加油,加油!四零後https://www.blogger.com/profile/07721892232323290832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-16412765981031596472014-05-06T21:26:22.706+08:002014-05-06T21:26:22.706+08:00根據電視台及報章報導,我個人認為二名警察會無事.
發生嚴重案件,要睇當時環境而定,不能隨意露械,
當...根據電視台及報章報導,我個人認為二名警察會無事.<br />發生嚴重案件,要睇當時環境而定,不能隨意露械,<br />當然經驗和判斷力非常重要.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15677118951129207998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-27185728872959803412014-05-06T19:12:05.838+08:002014-05-06T19:12:05.838+08:00狗議員得把口,如果係佢俾人用鎅刀"杭"住,會唔會嚇到賴屎賴尿?仲會話警察使用不必...狗議員得把口,如果係佢俾人用鎅刀"杭"住,會唔會嚇到賴屎賴尿?仲會話警察使用不必要暴力?Ricky Lamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05105485848632268337noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-83454268113821448372014-05-06T13:07:46.735+08:002014-05-06T13:07:46.735+08:00西環大佬唔好思,借你呢度講下時文, 關於警員救人反被糟質一事,細佬同FU哥呻下!果條涂乜伸垃圾局議員...西環大佬唔好思,借你呢度講下時文, 關於警員救人反被糟質一事,細佬同FU哥呻下!果條涂乜伸垃圾局議員唔知為乜,一二十年同警察有仇咁,又馬上跳出嚟抽水,其實前線差人壓力好鬼大,佢又唔係同你有仇,而且香港警隊警例好鬼嚴,掂下枝槍都要寫餐死,明知惡哽,打份工咋,邊個會咁屎忽去扮西部牛仔或者007?打手打腳喎,你打俾我睇下?電光火石之間,棍同噴霧都"冇可能"發揮"瞬息萬變"救到個女人,警隊用嘅子彈唔同軍用嘅,殺傷力有限,而且未必即中要害,記得廿多卅年前港島天星碼頭一個台灣歹徒被截查,發生槍戰, 三名警員,射晒十八發子彈,而且全中,呢個歹徒尚未倒下,仲要還槍,幸好佢支曲尺爭珠,果三位前線差人先至逃過大難,家陣啲垃圾議員同垃圾新聞佬冇厘常識兼徧見兼抽水,,,,唉,當差真難,尤其家陣係香港做差人,,,,真係好,,,,慘,唉!四零後https://www.blogger.com/profile/07721892232323290832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4944660780978122445.post-64820529801004787722014-05-05T23:53:32.005+08:002014-05-05T23:53:32.005+08:00很簡單,4個字可以解釋整件事情,淮橘為枳~~很簡單,4個字可以解釋整件事情,淮橘為枳~~oceandeep3000https://www.blogger.com/profile/15295585199137008654noreply@blogger.com